Showing posts with label subsidy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label subsidy. Show all posts

Subsidy and Types of Subsidies | Subsidy is a financial incentive by the government to the consumers or producers

Subsidy is a financial incentive by the government to the consumers and/or producers. According to P. A. Samuelson and William D. Nordhaus, “A payment by a government to a firm or household that provides or consumers a commodity”.

A subsidy can be used to support businesses that might otherwise fail, or to keep prices below what they would be in a free market or to encourage activities that would otherwise not take place. For producers/suppliers ‘subsidy’ is the financial support/grant generally by the government to private firms (which may be called investment grants) and to state-owned firms (covering losses).

 

Types of Subsidies


There are many forms of subsidies given out by the government, including welfare payments, farm subsidies, housing loans and student loans. For example, if a domestic industry, like farming, is struggling to survive in a highly competitive international industry with low prices, a government may give cash subsidies to farms so that they can sell their product at the low market price but still achieve financial gain.

Subsidies provided by the government are classified on different bases for example on the basis of the recipients of the subsidy (e.g., consumer or producer) or on the basis of the source of the funds (government, consumer, general tax revenues, etc). In economics, one of the most important ways to classify subsidies is the mean/way of distributing the subsidy. We briefly introduce the major forms of government subsidies as follows:

i) Direct subsidies

Direct subsidies involve a direct cash transfer to the recipient by the government, for example an unemployed person or an agricultural corporation. These are the most simple and perhaps the least frequently used forms of government subsidy. During the 19th century, as the American frontier (boarder line) was moving westward, the federal government gave extensive grants of land and construction funds to the railroads. In the 20th century, governments in Europe, North America, and Japan give direct payments for ship construction and some forms of public transportation.

ii) Indirect subsidies

Indirect subsidy is a broad term that would cover any form of subsidy that does not involve a direct transfer. These are the most widespread, if less visible, forms of support/aid provided by the government to private enterprise and other institutions. Indirect subsidies may take such forms as favorable tax policies, loans, import quotas, and price supports. For example, if the Government of Nepal persuades India or China to limit their new chocolates exports to Nepal, Nepalese chocolates industry would benefit.

iii) Tax subsidy

A tax that is below its optimal level generates a “tax subsidy.” Under this form of subsidy, the recipients get the benefits through the tax system, usually through the income tax, profit tax or consumption tax systems. Examples may include tax deductions for workers in certain industries, accelerated depreciation for certain industries or types of equipment or exemption/omission from consumption tax (sales tax or value added tax).

Subsidies provided through tax breaks are described as “corporate welfare.” A tax break is a reduction in the normal rate of a particular class of taxes targeted towards an individual or group of companies. Bigger tax breaks are provided to larger companies which are planning to open a new factory (e.g., shop) around a location. Locations provide these tax breaks because they often feel that the benefits of job creation will more than the decline in tax revenues. Governments of all levels may do this to encourage employment in under-developed areas. Tax subsidies are given as a protection to smaller producers to help them compete with larger companies, to help correct international trade imbalances, to support industry, believed important to national security and to help industry compete with other countries and these are common practice throughout the world.

However, there is debate/dispute on whether such subsidy should also apply to firms that create excessive social cost in the form of environmental degradation and public health costs. The most effective way of compensating for the problems as traditional economic theory suggests is to internalize the cost (by regulations, or other means).

iv) Labor subsidies

A labor subsidy is any form of subsidy provided by the government to pay for labor costs. Examples may include labor subsidies and tax deductions for workers in industries, such as the film and/or television industries. Wage subsidies provide a financial incentive to eligible/authorized employers when considering the employment of job seekers with disability or with other barriers to employment. Wage subsidies are payments made to employers to help cover the costs of paying wages at least for short run. They also aim to increase the competitiveness of job seekers, including those with disability. During economic recession, government provides labor subsidies to employers.

v) Production subsidies

Governments in certain case (for example to encourage the development of a particular industry) may provide direct production subsidies – cash payments for production of a given goods or services. Normally, production subsidies are easily identifiable, such as minimum price policies. Indirect production subsidies may be less easy to identify, such as infrastructure subsidies.

vi) Perverse subsidies

Famous environmental economist Norman Myers has argued on “perverse subsidies”. The term “perverse” can be applied to a subsidy by its opponents if they believe that it encourages adverse/undesirable actions with social costs. Possible examples, suggested by Norman Myers are German subsidies on coal mining and American petrol (gasoline) subsidies.

vii) Infrastructure subsidies

Infrastructure subsidies may refer to a form of indirect production subsidy. The provision of infrastructure (at public expense) may effectively be useful for only a limited group of potential users, such as construction of roads at government expense for a single logging company. The implication is that those users or industries benefit disproportionately from the provision of that infrastructure, at the expense of taxpayers.

In some cases, the government may need to improve the public transport by subsidizing those transportation agencies that provide the public services so that the services can be affordable for everyone. This is the best way of helping different groups of disabled and low income families in the society.

viii) Export subsidies

Various taxes or other subsidy measures may be used to promote exports of favored – industries. In other cases, tax measures may be used to ensure that export subsidies are justified as a means of compensating for the subsidies or protections provided by a foreign state to its own producers.

ix) Trade protection

Measures used to limit imports from other countries may form/represent another type of hidden subsidy. The economic argument is that consumers of a given product are forced to pay higher prices for a given goods than they would pay without the trade barrier; the protected industry has effectively received a subsidy. Such measures include import quotas, import tariffs, import bans and others.

x) Consumption subsidies

Customers would pay only market prices for goods and services if economic competitions were totally unhindered/unhampered and all markets were free and unregulated. Competition would serve/work to keep prices low and quality high. But this situation rarely exists because of a wide range of government policies that affect the selling prices and the quantities of most items produced and offered for sale.

The provision of public goods (e.g., health and education services through consumption subsidies is an example of a type of subsidy recognized/identified as ‘efficient’ by economics. In some cases, consumption subsidies may be targeted at a specific group of users, such as large utilities, residential home-owners and others.

xi) Purchasing subsidies

Government everywhere is relatively large consumers of various goods and services. Subsidies may occur in this process by choice of the products consumed, the producer, the nature of the product itself, and by other means, including payment of higher-than-market prices for goods purchased.

xii) Subsidies due to the effect of debt guarantees

Another form of subsidy is due to the practice of a government guaranteeing a lender payment if a particular borrower defaults (fails to pay). For example, this occurs in the United States, in certain airline industry loans, in most student loans, in small business administration loans and in mortgage (home equity) backed bonds. A government guarantee of payment lowers the risk of the loan for a lender and since interest rates are mainly based on risk, the interest rate for the borrower lowers as well.

xiii) Price subsidy

Price subsidy is a form of government intervention resulting in a deviation/discrepancy of an actual price facing consumers and producers from a specified “optimal/appropriate” benchmark price level. Government price are common/widespread in developed, emerging, and low-income countries. They reflect public choices in favor of certain economic outcomes and/or efforts to overcome market failures. For example, almost all governments subsidize the costs of education and health services for the mass of their populations. Food and energy subsidies are relatively large in many emerging and low-income countries. Many governments subsidize the cost of transport. Agricultural subsidies are relatively large in number of developed countries. Other common subsidies include those for utilities, public services, and pharmaceutical products.

             You may also like to read:             

Externalities in the Economy | Economic effects that occur from the production or the use of goods

Externalities are pervasive and significant phenomena in modern societies. The term externalities refer to the economic effects which occur from the production or the use of goods to other parties or economic units. It is said that public goods and externalities are not un-related. In other words, public goods and externalities are related. Externalities may affect a large number of people in a uniform manner, in which case the externality is essentially a public good (or public “bad”).

For example, education increases the skills and general welfare of the person being educated and may in addition, make the person better citizen. That is, the person’s behavior in political process may be more wise and informed, and an informed may make better political decisions. Since, such decisions affect every one, the education of each person produces an external benefit that accrues to the members of the community and the nation in which person reside.

This external benefit is a public good that is jointly produced along with the private goods (marketable skills) resulting from education.

Similarly, air pollution generated by an iron mill’s smoke and the exhaust of automobiles are public bads that are produced jointly with private goods (iron mills and private transportation). Again, the railways using a lot of coal in firing steam locomotives put the residential and other areas near the railway loco sheds to a lot of suffering on account of the smoke nuisance. These are the cost to the society but not to the individual undertaking.

In the above examples, public goods, i.e., benefits and public bads that are produced with private goods are known as externalities. These are the cost to the society but not the individual undertaking. This causes divergence between private cost (internal cost) and social marginal cost or external cost of benefit, of the goods in question. Market takes into account of internal costs and not the social marginal cost or external cost (or benefit) of the goods in question. Consumers reveal their preferences for the benefits which are wholly internalized (rival) but not for the external benefits, i.e., purification of air (non-rival). Thus, market fails to achieve efficient allocation of resources when externalities are present.

To be more clear, let the production of a commodity, say iron generates air pollution that adversely affects the welfare of the people in the surrounding community. The cost of iron, thus, have two components: (i) the cost of the labor, machines, iron ore, coal and other inputs directly required to produce the iron; and (ii) the costs borne by the members of the community in the form of air pollution damages. Market takes into account first component of the above costs but not the second. This is the cause of divergence between private cost (internal cost) and the social marginal cost (external bads). Hence, markets fail to achieve efficient allocation of resources when externalities, i.e., external costs or benefits are present.

Thus, externalities can take many forms. For example, external benefits from education: children gain from having educated parents; society benefits in so far as education reduces crime, social un-rest, unemployment and welfare costs; society benefits from an educational system that inculcates acceptable social values, improves communication and strengthen democratic institutions, on the (external bads) side are many forms of pollution and other disseminates such as congestion and noise etc.

i) Externalities in the form of external benefits

Problems of social goods-type arise not only in the budgetary context but also wherever private consumption or production activities generate external benefits. Suppose, for instance, that A derives benefits being inoculated against polio but this also benefits others, since the number of potential carriers and hence the danger of infection, is reduced. Similarly, by getting educated, A not only derives personal benefits but also makes it possible for others to enjoy association with a more educated community. Since, large number of other consumers may be affected, market does not work and a budgetary process is needed to secure preference revelation. But budgetary intervention in this case will not involve full budgetary provision rather, it will take the form of subsidy to private purchases.

ii) Externalities in the form of external costs or bads

Let us now consider a case of a commodity which generates external costs or bads. Suppose, the production of iron generates air pollution that adversely affects the welfare of the people in the surrounding community. The cost of iron, thus, has two components: (i) the cost of the labor, machines, iron ore, coal and other inputs directly required to produce the iron, and (ii) the costs borne by member of community in the form of air pollution damages. However, the second component of cost is not taken into account by the market. In fact, private activities, whether in production or consumption frequently give rise to external costs which are not accounted for by the market. Hence, public (Government) intervention is needed to get this part of the cost to be internalized.

iii) Efficiency and equity problems

In the first place, failure to account for external costs leads to an over supply of production question (i.e., here iron) and an under supply of the benefits (i.e., clean air) which are reduced by pollution. This is the efficiency problem. If the damage cost of pollution were internalized, resource use would become more efficient. The price of iron would be higher, less iron would be produced and the air quality would be improved.

Second, the existence of pollution poses distributional or equity problems. Through, the loss of environmental quality, consumers of air are forced to subsidize consumers of iron, much as they would if a tax were imposed on them (consumers of air) and transferred to the latter (i.e., consumers of iron). Moreover, the incidence of pollution damage may fall with different weight upon low income and high income families, and this affects the distribution of real income. The same goes for the cost of pollution prevention and the net gains to be derived there from.

iv) Efficient solution

It should, however, be noted that air is a public property, it is a social good. The principle of exclusion does not apply. Hence, market fail to take into account external costs or the damages caused by air pollution. The benefits of this good are shared by all those who are damaged by pollution.

               You may also like to read: